vibe

Chapter 6 - Who Controlled the Original

A computer's location did not identify its user. Mercer's former office had hosted multiple staff and shared-service connections. Price needed the access logs before we pointed at a person. I wrote that distinction above my desk.

Dana filed an updated disclosure. It included the service-cache result and Lang's interview notes. She also moved to continue the trial long enough for the government and defense to examine the original source device under supervised conditions. Judge Rowe approved a narrowly tailored forensic inspection. She reminded counsel that a motion wasn't a public referendum on Colonel Mercer.

The next problem was the data drive. The quality office had given Price a backup copy, but the actual recording system remained in a storage cabinet scheduled for disposal. A custodian testified he had marked it for routine destruction after an equipment refresh. His inventory showed the preservation notice had arrived in the office mailbox before the destruction date. It did not show that he personally received the notice.

"We might have a preservation failure," Price told me. "We don't yet know if it was deliberate."

A different case might have tempted me to accuse every person who touched that cabinet. This case had already taught me what accusations cost. I let Price follow the serial numbers and dates.

While the technical work continued, Dana and I met in a corridor alcove after an unrelated hearing. She held a sealed cup of tea between both hands.

"I should have pushed harder for the original," she said.

"You requested a search."

"I accepted the no-record response because it fit the lab packet. I didn't compare the inventory counts myself."

"That was a mistake."

"I know."

She looked exhausted. I remembered sharing awful cafeteria sandwiches with her during our first JAG training, back when we talked about becoming the lawyers who would always ask one more question. Neither of us had imagined how ordinary fatigue could change what counted as enough.

"Mercer asked me to delete the original file," Dana said. "He called it an incomplete working copy that could mislead a jury. I told him I wouldn't. I sent the issue to the legal office and asked for a proper preservation decision."

"Why didn't you tell me earlier?"

"I believed the final laboratory report contained the necessary data. I was wrong about that, and I should have disclosed the request and the debate sooner."

I wanted to ask whether she was afraid of him. It was a question that sounded kind but would let her off too easily. Instead, I asked whether she had documented her refusal.

"In an email," she said. "It was copied to an account I didn't think belonged to the case. The judge has authorized review of its discoverability. You'll receive whatever we are required to produce."

A day later I did. The email said Dana did not consider an incomplete result disposable until its relationship to the final certification could be established. Mercer replied with three curt lines: YOU ARE NOT THE SCIENTIFIC AUTHORITY. DO NOT HOLD UP DEPLOYMENT WITH LEGAL HYPOTHETICALS. SEND THE WORKING COPY TO RECORDS FOR REPLACEMENT.

The words made his judgment look worse. They still did not establish who made the altered electronic entry.

Tasha recovered an earlier medical spreadsheet. Its missing column identified each soldier's water source; without it, the outbreak looked general. The recovered data clustered cases around the disputed purification unit.

I called Jonah's mother to explain why we were seeking his consent for additional medical-record review. She listened, then asked whether any of our motions would help him walk out of the hospital faster.

"Not directly," I admitted. "It may help determine what he was exposed to."

"Then do that," she said. "Don't turn him into somebody's campaign speech."

I put her words on a sticky note above my desk.

At the next status conference, the judge authorized production of the relevant medical appendix with privacy protections for affected soldiers. She also ordered the government to account for the missing pages before trial. We were making progress by inches, not by revelations.

When we returned to the office, Price stood in the doorway holding a printout with a gray band across the top.

"The source drive was erased after the preservation notice," he said.

My breath caught.

"Routine maintenance?" I asked.

"That's what the ticket says. But the erase command wasn't scheduled. It was entered manually."

May you like

The authorization field contained a person's name.

Captain Dana Webb.

Related Stories

Other posts